<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ahmad Brooks in trouble..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stripehype.com/2008/05/02/ahmad-brooks-in-trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stripehype.com/2008/05/02/ahmad-brooks-in-trouble/</link>
	<description>A Cincinnati Bengals Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:33:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IgnatiusJReilly</title>
		<link>http://stripehype.com/2008/05/02/ahmad-brooks-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>IgnatiusJReilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stripehype.com/2008/05/02/ahmad-brooks-in-trouble/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still hoping that it amounts to nothing, that the charges against Brooks turn out to be false. Since the story first broke, there&#039;s been exactly zero coverage, zero happening presumably, and only the specter of a June 6th court appearance to remember it by. One of those &quot;no news is good news&quot; type situations, maybe?
Given the nature of the offense, should it be true, the Bengals would probably be forced to cut Brooks even though compared to, say, Henry, he may deserve second chance. Plus, this is Cincinnati- not Pittsburgh where a domestic violence beef gets you only an anger management course- with all that entails reputation-wise and Mikey &amp; Marvin have already crowed about zero tolerance.
Of course, Dallas will promptly sign him to their padded halfway house.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still hoping that it amounts to nothing, that the charges against Brooks turn out to be false. Since the story first broke, there&#8217;s been exactly zero coverage, zero happening presumably, and only the specter of a June 6th court appearance to remember it by. One of those &#8220;no news is good news&#8221; type situations, maybe?<br />
Given the nature of the offense, should it be true, the Bengals would probably be forced to cut Brooks even though compared to, say, Henry, he may deserve second chance. Plus, this is Cincinnati- not Pittsburgh where a domestic violence beef gets you only an anger management course- with all that entails reputation-wise and Mikey &amp; Marvin have already crowed about zero tolerance.<br />
Of course, Dallas will promptly sign him to their padded halfway house.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domandjen1976 Dominic Gross</title>
		<link>http://stripehype.com/2008/05/02/ahmad-brooks-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>domandjen1976 Dominic Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stripehype.com/2008/05/02/ahmad-brooks-in-trouble/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>What do you think the NFL will do to Brooks?  I think Bengals will be in second chance mode with Brooks.  Think so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think the NFL will do to Brooks?  I think Bengals will be in second chance mode with Brooks.  Think so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IgnatiusJReilly</title>
		<link>http://stripehype.com/2008/05/02/ahmad-brooks-in-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>IgnatiusJReilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stripehype.com/2008/05/02/ahmad-brooks-in-trouble/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>I think you should put a big red circle with a slash through it over Chad&#039;s face in the banner. You know, like how a teenaged weirdo does to his yearbook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should put a big red circle with a slash through it over Chad&#8217;s face in the banner. You know, like how a teenaged weirdo does to his yearbook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
